Text Size: A+| A-| A   |   Text Only Site   |   Accessibility

       
   

All Contested Case Subject
Constitutional Issues

  • For legislation authorizing administrative decision-making to withstand a vagueness challenge, it must contain sufficient guidelines for the exercise of the administrative decision-making authority. Jorgens, Judith A, 12 CCHR 127 (2007).

  • The employer failed to show that WCD exceeded its statutory authority and violated the Equal Protection Clause of Oregon's Constitution by requiring suitable employment to be "permanent". Reyes, Armando, 9 CCHR 448 (2004).

  • Order on default was not warranted because claimant did not receive adequate notice. Johnston, Glen A., 9 CCHR 380 (2004).

  • Claimant's argument that the rule imposing a 180-day time limit for filing penalty requests denied him due process is not persuasive. Hathaway, Douglas, 8 CCHR 112 (2003).


  • *Note: Subsequent action

    If you have questions about this webpage, please contact , .

     

    Get Adobe Acrobat ReaderAdobe Reader is required to view PDF files. Click the "Get Adobe Reader" image to get a free download of the reader from Adobe. Available for Macintosh or Windows.