|
All Contested Case Subject Constitutional Issues
For legislation authorizing administrative decision-making to withstand a vagueness challenge, it must contain sufficient guidelines for the exercise of the administrative decision-making authority. Jorgens, Judith A,
12 CCHR 127 (2007).
The employer failed to show that WCD exceeded its statutory authority and violated the Equal Protection Clause of Oregon's Constitution by requiring suitable employment to be "permanent". Reyes, Armando,
9 CCHR 448 (2004).
Order on default was not warranted because claimant did not receive adequate notice. Johnston, Glen A.,
9 CCHR 380 (2004).
Claimant's argument that the rule imposing a 180-day time limit for filing penalty requests denied him due process is not persuasive. Hathaway, Douglas,
8 CCHR 112 (2003).
*Note: Subsequent action
|