|
During the most
recent revision of OAR 436-105, we attempted to clarify certain portions of the
rules that were unclear, and we made an effort to simplify the process for obtaining
reimbursement benefits. The following questions provide a summary of the changes
we made during this revision:
|
|
|
|
|

|
What are examples
of "consumables," as defined in OAR 436-105-0005(3)?
|
|
|
|
|

|
OAR 436-105-0005(3)
defines "Consumables" as "purchases required to support the functioning
of tools or equipment during transitional work." Because previous versions
of the rules were unclear about whether or not consumables were eligible for
reimbursement under the Employer-at-Injury Program, the division added this definition
to clarify that consumables are eligible for reimbursement, as mentioned in OAR
436-105-0520(3)(b). Examples include (but are not limited to) batteries, nails
for a nail gun, or ink for a printer.
|
|
|

|
How does the addition
of "consumables" change the rules?
|
|
|
|
|

|
In older versions
of the rules, the Division did not specifically mention that consumables were
eligible EAIP purchases. Because of this, some employers said they could not
purchase certain tools and equipment when those items also required an additional
ongoing expense that was unaccounted for in their budgets.
Now it is clear, in OAR 436-105-0520(3)(b), that employers can purchase tools
and equipment that require the use of these consumable materials. Consumables
can be included within the maximum amount available for reimbursement through
the EAIP category of "tools and equipment."
|
|
|

|
What documentation
is required during an audit of EAIP purchases?
|
|
|
|
|

|
In an audit, WCD
looks for a legible copy of proof of payment for EAIP purchases, including proof
the item was ordered during the EAIP. OAR 436-105-0500(7)(d).
|
|
|

|
Do I have to provide
proof that an item was delivered during the EAIP eligibility period?
|
|
|
|
|

|
No. OAR 436-105-0500(7)(d)
only requires proof that the item was "ordered during the EAIP period, and
proof of payment of the items
"
Even though items are ordered during the eligibility period, certain hang-ups
may occur outside the employer's control that delay delivery of the purchases
until after the eligibility period ends. The employer will not be penalized for
things that are outside of their control, such as items being on back order,
delays in shipment, etc. The employer's requirements are simply to order during
the eligibility period and pay for the item.
|
|
 |
What
is the intent of the new language, "that resulted in the worker's EAIP eligibility,
or to prevent a worsening of the worker's accepted or deferred conditions"
in OAR 436-105-0520(2)? |
| |
|
 |
The
intent of worksite modification purchases is to overcome restrictions caused by
the worker's injury. This rule language specifies that worksite modification purchases
must be tied to the restrictions that resulted from the injury while allowing for
the purchase of items that help prevent a worsening of the worker's condition or
provide greater comfort to the worker during the recovery process.
A common example may be the purchase of an anti-fatigue mat for a worker who can
stand only for limited time periods. While the mat does not remove the worker's
stand-duration restriction, the anti-fatigue mat can reduce the worker's discomfort
in standing during the recovery period. |
|
 |
Wage
subsidy reimbursements require payroll records showing the hours worked. However,
our company does not track hours worked for our salaried employees. What documentation
should I provide to show hours worked for a salaried employee? |
| |
|
 |
OAR
436-105-0500(7)(c) outlines the requirements for providing documentation of payroll
records. In cases where standard payroll records do not include the dates and hours
worked each day, the rules allow for "supplemental documentation" of
hours worked and how the worker's earnings were calculated for the wage subsidy.
Supplemental documentation can include a record of the worker's work schedule and
irregularities of the worker's work schedule. |
|
 |
Does
the EAIP program reimburse the shipping cost of items ordered for EAIP purchases? |
| |
|
 |
Yes,
the shipping costs can be included in the total purchase cost, as long as the total
does not exceed the maximum amount allowed for the category. Anything over the
maximum can be purchased, but the program will only reimburse up to the maximum
category amount. |
|
 |
What
should I do if a worker has multiple claims that would have modified duty during
the same time period? Should I submit documentation for both claims, or should
I keep the claims separate? |
| |
|
 |
OAR
436-105-0520 and 0530 say that the EAIP can be used only once per worker per claim
opening, and that a worker is eligible for only one EAIP at a time.
As an example, imagine that while a worker is in transitional work for injury #1,
he has injury #2 and because of his restrictions, cannot continue doing the transitional
work for injury #1. Because the worker can only do one individual EAIP at a time,
transitional work for injury #1 would be put on hold in order to provide transitional
work for injury #2. (The second injury is a different claim, so it would also be
a different individual EAIP). When the individual EAIP for injury #2 is completed,
you could resume transitional work and individual EAIP for injury #1 if still needed. |
|
 |
OAR 436-105-0500(7)(f)
states that I must provide "documentation of the transitional work, which
must include the start date, wage and hours, and a description of job duties."
What constitutes a "description of job duties?" |
| |
|
 |
If
the medical release is documented through a medical provider's statement that the
worker is not released to regular employment, accompanied by a job description
which includes the job duties and physical demands required for the transitional
work, you have it covered. If there is a medical release that states the worker's
specific restrictions, the description of job duties can be a brief description
of duties sufficient to document that the job is not regular work and that the
work is within the worker's injury-caused limitations. |
|
 |
Who receives
the wage subsidy reimbursement when I am covered under an employer "wrap-up"
policy? |
| |
|
 |
A "wrap-up"
policy is another term for Owner Controlled Insurance Program (OCIP). With this
type of policy, the owner purchases insurance on behalf of all contractors employed
for a specific project. The insurance covers contractors, subcontractors, construction
management and state employees working on the construction site who are approved
by the owner for participation in the program. The contractors are required to
carry their own insurance for work off the site and to pay a deductible when
claims occur.
When considering the recipient of EAIP benefits, the Workers' Compensation Division
defines "employer" based on ORS 656.005(13)(a), which states that an
employer is a person who "contracts to pay a remuneration for and secures
the right to direct and control the services of any person." With this consideration,
the Division will provide benefits to the employer that directs and controls
the daily work activities of the worker.
If one of your workers is injured while working under an OCIP policy, you should
file the injury report under the OCIP policy. In this case, the owner of the
OCIP policy would be considered the legal employer for purposes of compensability
- meaning it would be responsible for processing the claim. For this reason,
the claim should be filed under the OCIP policy. However, the policy owner's
involvement with the claim does not extend beyond processing the claim.
On the other hand, the contracted employer would be considered to be the employer
for purposes of Employer-at-Injury Program benefits. The contracted employer
directly controls the services of, and directly distributes the payroll to the
worker, and therefore the contracted employer more closely fits the definition
of "employer" as outlined in Oregon Revised Statute. As a result, because
the contracted employer controls the daily work activities of the worker, s/he
would receive the EAIP benefits, including wage subsidy. Any EAIP reimbursement
paid to the owner of the OCIP policy should be passed through to the contracted
employer.
|
|
 |
If a
worksite modification will cost more than $2500, can I itemize the separate components
of the modification and utilize funds from the "tools and equipment"
category to purchase some of the components of the modification? |
| |
|
 |
It
depends on the nature of the worksite modification. If separate components of the
worksite modification purchase are essential to the functioning of the worksite
modification, they should be considered part of the modification and are not "tools
and equipment." This is especially true when components are bundled and sold
together with the modification. For example, if you were to purchase a table saw
as worksite modification, the saw blades are part of the modification, and should
not be itemized as "tools and equipment."
On the other hand, if the components of a worksite modification have completely
different functions, then they may also qualify as "tools and equipment"
purchases. For example, if the worksite modification includes an ergonomic workstation,
ergonomic chair, and a cordless headset, then the chair and headset could qualify
under either worksite modification or tools and equipment. |
|